infoschoolИнформатика в школеInformatics in school2221-1993Publishing House Education and Informatics10.32517/2221-1993-2026-25-3-25-30infoschool-930Research ArticleМЕТОДИЧЕСКАЯ КОПИЛКАTEACHING PRACTICESЦели обучения и их оценивание в мире ИИ-инструментовLearning objectives and their evaluation in the world of artificial intelligence toolsУваровА. Ю.UvarovA. Yu.

Уваров Александр Юрьевич, доктор пед. наук, профессор кафедры прикладной информатики в образовании, Институт математики и информатики

г. Москва

Alexander Yu. Uvarov, doctor of sciences (Education), professor at the department of Applied Informatics in Education, Institute of mathematics and Informatics

Moscow

auvarov@mail.ruМосковский педагогический государственный университетРоссияMoscow Pedagogical State UniversityRussian Federation202631072026032530Copyright © Уваров А.Ю., 20262026Уваров А.Ю.Uvarov A.Y.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://school.infojournal.ru/jour/article/view/930

Генеративный искусственный интеллект (ГенИИ) коренным образом меняет рынок труда и состав компетенций, которые требуются от работников. Перед учителями встает растущая проблема: как обучать и как контролировать достижение образовательных результатов, если все знания учащиеся легко получают из интернета, а интеллектуальные помощники мгновенно решают контрольные задания. Учебные программы по-прежнему ориентированы на передачу фактических знаний, хотя интеллектуальные инструменты (ИнИн), которые разрабатывают специалисты в области искусственного интеллекта, справляются с этим лучше отличников. Пока новые стандарты и программы разрабатываются, педагоги-инноваторы уже начали корректировать цели обучения, ориентируясь на формирование у обучаемых способностей, которые нельзя автоматизировать с помощью ИнИн (критическое мышление, творчество, эмпатия, этические суждения, умение полноценно использовать возможности ИнИн для решения своих задач). В статье обсуждается указанная проблема и предлагается описание процедур, которые помогают модернизировать цели обучения и способы их оценивания для подготовки школьников к жизни в мире, который наполнен интеллектуальными инструментами.

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is fundamentally changing the job market and the skills required for AI-era citizens. teachers face an increasing challenge in how to teach, and how to assess educational outcomes, when students can access knowledge easily online and intelligent tools can instantly solve school tests. Educational programs still focus on knowledge impartment, but intelligent tools developed by AI-experts are outperforming students. new standards and programs have been developed, and innovative educators are adjusting their learning goals towards developing skills that AI cannot automate (critical thinking, creativity, empathy, ethics, and the ability to use AI to solve problems fully). this article addresses this issue, providing a procedure to help teachers modernise their learning goals and assessments to prepare students for the world of intelligent tools.

генеративный ИИцели обученияоцениваниетаксономия БлумаИИ-грамотностьтрансформация образованияgenerative AIlearning objectivesassessmentbloom's taxonomyAI literacyeducational transformationReferencesDigComp 3.0 — Joint Research Centre — European Commission. https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/projects-and-activities/education-and-trainig/digital-transformation-education/digital-competence-framework-digcomp/digcomp-30_enDigComp 3.0 — Joint Research Centre — European Commission. https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/projects-and-activities/education-and-trainig/digital-transformation-education/digital-competence-framework-digcomp/digcomp-30_enLubbe A., Marais E., Kruger D. Cultivating independent thinkers: The triad of artificial intelligence, Bloom’s taxonomy and critical thinking in assessment pedagogy // Education and Information Technologies. 2025. Vol. 30. P. 17589–17622. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-025-13476-x,Lubbe A., Marais E., Kruger D. Cultivating independent thinkers: The triad of artificial intelligence, Bloom’s taxonomy and critical thinking in assessment pedagogy // Education and Information Technologies. 2025. Vol. 30. P. 17589–17622. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-025-13476-x,Oregon State Ecampus. Advancing Meaningful Learning in the Age of AI (2025). https://ecampus.oregonstate.edu/news/advancing-meaningful-learning-in-the-age-of-ai/Oregon State Ecampus. Advancing Meaningful Learning in the Age of AI (2025). https://ecampus.oregonstate.edu/news/advancing-meaningful-learning-in-the-age-of-ai/UNESCO. AI and the Futures of Education. Futures Dialogues. 2025. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/ai-and-futures-educationUNESCO. AI and the Futures of Education. Futures Dialogues. 2025. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/ai-and-futures-educationUNESCO AI competency framework for teachers // UNESСO. 2024. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/ai-compe-tency-framework-teachersUNESCO AI competency framework for teachers // UNESСO. 2024. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/ai-compe-tency-framework-teachersWeipeng Yang. Reefing educational objectives in the age of artificial intelligence: The SCALE taxonomy // TAO. 2025. Vol. 1. Is. 2. Art. 100018. DOI: 10.1016/j.tao.2025.100018.Weipeng Yang. Reefing educational objectives in the age of artificial intelligence: The SCALE taxonomy // TAO. 2025. Vol. 1. Is. 2. Art. 100018. DOI: 10.1016/j.tao.2025.100018.World Economic Forum. Future of Jobs Report 2025. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025/World Economic Forum. Future of Jobs Report 2025. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025/World Economic Forum. How education can transform disruptive AI advances intoworkforceopportunities. 2025. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/10/education-disruptive-ai-workforce-opportunities/?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22234048793&gbraid=0AAAAAoVy5FzI0ud_eueTtn7cnrxwMWn3&gclid=CjwKCAiAwNDMBhBfEiwAd7ti1DEqSi0wfbwvnHX-mQGt1TQnB6YJT5EoCZDqLcOHIO4RAjQhJzu1hoCdVIQAvD_BwEWorld Economic Forum. How education can transform disruptive AI advances intoworkforceopportunities. 2025. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/10/education-disruptive-ai-workforce-opportunities/?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22234048793&gbraid=0AAAAAoVy5FzI0ud_eueTtn7cnrxwMWn3&gclid=CjwKCAiAwNDMBhBfEiwAd7ti1DEqSi0wfbwvnHX-mQGt1TQnB6YJT5EoCZDqLcOHIO4RAjQhJzu1hoCdVIQAvD_BwEBaule S. Balancing Bloom, assessment, and AI // eSchool News. May 27, 2024. https://www.eschoolnews.com/digital-learning/2024/05/27/balancing-bloom-assessment-and-ai/Baule S. Balancing Bloom, assessment, and AI // eSchool News. May 27, 2024. https://www.eschoolnews.com/digital-learning/2024/05/27/balancing-bloom-assessment-and-ai/Clark L. A. Reframing Bloom’s for the age of AI: A white paper for future-ready educators. August 22, 2025 // Anthology Inc. https://backstage.anthology.com/sites/default/files/2025-09/ReframingBloomsForTheAgeOfAI_WhitePaper_v1.pdfClark L. A. Reframing Bloom’s for the age of AI: A white paper for future-ready educators. August 22, 2025 // Anthology Inc. https://backstage.anthology.com/sites/default/files/2025-09/ReframingBloomsForTheAgeOfAI_WhitePaper_v1.pdfO’Connell J., Baule S. Harnessing generative AI to revolutionize educator growth. Winona State University, January 17, 2025. https://www.eschoolnews.com/digital-learning/2025/01/17/generative-ai-teacher-professional-development/O’Connell J., Baule S. Harnessing generative AI to revolutionize educator growth. Winona State University, January 17, 2025. https://www.eschoolnews.com/digital-learning/2025/01/17/generative-ai-teacher-professional-development/UNESCO. Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. 2024.UNESCO. Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. 2024.Zaphir L., Hansen D. The trouble with Bloom’s taxonomy in an age of AI // Times Higher Education. 19.04.2024. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/trouble-blooms-taxonomy-age-aiZaphir L., Hansen D. The trouble with Bloom’s taxonomy in an age of AI // Times Higher Education. 19.04.2024. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/trouble-blooms-taxonomy-age-ai

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.